Event listings

Announcements of conferences, workshops, schools…

The Psi-k forum mailing lists are now closed permanently. Please read this announcement about the new Psi-k mailing list.

PQ-DFT: workshop on Precision Quantification in ... (No replies)

stefaan.cottenier
6 years ago
stefaan.cottenier 6 years ago

PQ-DFT: workshop on Precision Quantification in DFT
UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 23-24 May 2019

The past few years have witnessed a growing interest in assessing the numerical precision of electronic structure software. Ideas about this emerged at different places and in different software communities (Lausanne, Gent, Louvain-la-Neuve, Lyngby, Washington DC, Paris, Berlin, …), whereas actual work often requires coordinated efforts. Meeting from time to time to brainstorm about broader trends and to define common goals and strategies is therefore meaningful. An early meeting of this kind in Paris (2014) has proven to be essential for later progress. Right now, this topic is at a crossroad again, and it is the right time to think about the next set of common goals.

For this purpose, we organize a brainstorming workshop.  27 speakers (listed underneath) will present their work & opinion about 7 topics (listed underneath), followed for every topic by a dedicated discussion session. Contributed posters can be displayed throughout the event.

For more information, visit https://pqdft2019.abinit.org

PQ-DFT is organized back to back to the 9th ABINIT Developer Workshop, organized at the same place, 20-22 May, 2019. See https://abidev2019.abinit.org/.

Looking forward to meeting you in Louvain-la-Neuve,
Stefaan Cottenier, Kurt Lejaeghere, Gian-Marco Rignanese, Matthieu Verstraete

=================

List of topics:

  • Status of the Delta project. Previous work focused on equation of state predictions for elemental crystals. What has been the impact of this work, and where are the areas that are under development or are yet untouched?
  • Development of PAW and pseudopotentials. One of the major advantages of extensive precision quantification has been the cross-comparison between several codes. How does the availability of curated all-electron data enable creating increasingly precise and efficient potentials for PAW or pseudopotential methods?
  • Precision assessment beyond total energies. Original efforts in precision quantification pertained to the energetic response of materials to pressure. What is to be expected when considering increasingly complex properties, such as electron and phonon bands, magnetization or spin-orbit effects?
  • Workflow and data management. Comparing precision across codes would benefit from a robust framework to transfer workflows between different software packages. In addition, simulation results need to be stored in databases to allow easy comparison and full accessibility. What is currently available and what are the needs from the viewpoint of precision quantification?
  • Assessing accuracy. Precision quantification fits into the wider emergent field of uncertainty quantification for electronic-structure codes. Especially accuracy has attracted much interest, i.e. the agreement between simulations and experimental or high-level theoretical results. What is the state of the art in accuracy quantification, and which parallels can be drawn for precision?
  • Pushing numerical convergence. Ensuring a good precision requires careful convergence of a wide range of numerical settings: basis set size, k-point sampling, Fourier grids,… Is it possible to reach absolute convergence of these settings? Can appropriate settings be determined automatically?
  • Precision quantification beyond DFT-PBE. Electronic-structure predictions are increasingly moving beyond the DFT-PBE level, even for routine use. What are the challenges for reproducible beyond-PBE predictions?

 

Confirmed speakers (alphabetical order):

Peter Blaha                      TU Wien, Austria
Volker Blum                    Duke U., USA
Martin Callsen                U. Gent, Belgium
Stefaan Cottenier           U. Gent, Belgium
Sam De Waele                U. Gent, Belgium
Claudia Draxl                   Humboldt U. Berlin, Germany
Kevin Garrity                   NIST, USA
Matteo Giantomassi     UCLouvain, Belgium
Andris Gulans                 Humboldt U. Berlin, Germany
Donald Hamann             Rutgers U., USA
Geoffroy Hautier            UCLouvain, Belgium
Nathalie Holzwarth        Wake Forest U., USA
François Jollet                 CEA Bruyeres, France
Merzuk Kaltak                 U. Vienna, Austria
Kurt Lejaeghere              U. Gent, Belgium
Miguel Marques             Martin-Luther U. Halle, Germany
Nicola Marzari                EPFL, Switzerland
Jens-Jorgen Mortensen DTU, Denmark
Jorg Neugebauer            MPI Dusseldorf, Germany
Pascal Pernot                  U. Paris Sud, France
Keith Refson                    U. London & ISIS, UK
Gian-Marco Rignanese  UCLouvain, Belgium
Thomas Ruh                    TU Wien, Austria
Francesca Tavazza         NIST, USA
Marc Torrent                  CEA Bruyeres, France
Michiel Van Setten         IMEC, Belgium
Igor Ying Zhang               Fudan U., Shanghai, China




Back to Event listings...

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ab initio (from electronic structure) calculation of complex processes in materials